“my” versus. “mine” into the multiple holder possessive

“We very enjoy your getting my and Gregg’s man to college now.” – however, I will suggest „the boy“ or even the kid’s identity would-be natural than just „my personal and you may Gregg’s kid“?

Whenever i agree with Warsaw Usually, would it nevertheless be grammatically right to use „mine“ in cases like this, if you feel off „mine“ because referring to „my boy“? That’s, can you imagine the initial sentence is actually which?:

– Okay, but I think Gregg’s kid should come first-in that circumstances and make obvious just what „mine“ is writing on:

In reality, it’s not precise about modern whether we’re talking about a couple pupils. In case it is one, together with speaker however wants to speak about each other themself and you can Gregg, however thought „Gregg’s and my personal guy“ could well be natural than just „My and you will Gregg’s kid“. If in case there are 2 – I’d like „Gregg’s and you may my loved ones“, In my opinion.

Hi porsche, I am still not so sure

– I am aware it is far from everything you expected, nevertheless significantly more I believe about any of it, the newest less reasoning We select to mention either Gregg or me; each other knows whose kid try with it. When we present all of our girl so you can somebody I don’t imagine we constantly say, „That is Gregg’s and my child“, however, possibly „This is the daughter“ otherwise „This really is my personal girl“. Furthermore, I think we’d be more attending state „my boy“ or „my child“ than simply „my man“, wouldn’t we? Or while i said before, merely explore their term:

To the analogy given about new question, my is correct and you will exploit grammatically hopeless – the others simply layout.

– We agree that what you state ‘s the cure for new unique concern, but the other individuals isn’t only on design, it’s about category of natural. I recently don’t believe that „my personal and Gregg’s boy“ is sheer English. It generally does not sound to me including anything a native audio speaker perform say.

Often, I go along with almost all that you told you, except for anything

Your said that the original sentence is not all that clear. We disagree. The adaptation put forth up until now possess an incredibly specific meaning:

can just only suggest the same thing. A number of would state this is certainly ungrammatical, having „my“ upcoming very first, in case maybe not ungrammatical, it is at the least believed impolite by the the. That it pronoun move is wholly improper, despite everyday message. For many who chat such as this, folk, „educated“ or perhaps not, usually consider you might be an earlier teenager exactly who can not put down the cellular phone.

may also merely indicate Greg keeps a child, you’ve got a separate child, and individuals grabbed one another children to school. While this as well as matical, it’s still rude. See the comment above from the „my“.

Note, evey unmarried one of them items is completely unambiguous. Possibly are grammatical, many can be eliminated to possess factors stated.

Last, Tend to, the comment in regards to the need discuss Greg is extremely well removed. Particularly for instances when Greg and you’ve got a child together, it will be extremely unlikely to mention Greg anyway (that makes it even clearer one to „mine“ meaans one or two some other babies). First, by bringing up Greg, it’s at the least meant that he is perhaps not indeed expose. If that was the situation, why should the guy additionally be mentioned? You’ll merely state

We totally concur that all the phrases you offered is actually unambiguous, however, they’ve been all outcome of our very own translation of the brand spanking new sentence. Ok, since sbee upcoming asks in the event it are ‘my’, the guy really does inform you, however, if we use the completely new sentence whilst really stands instead you to feedback, https://datingranking.net/jpeoplemeet-review/ then i still found it uncertain. We thinkl that’s what I meant.